Regulations3 min readAugust 6, 2026

BC's Dual Agency Ban: What Real Estate Licensees Need to Know

British Columbia moved from a disclosure-based to a prohibition-based model for dual agency. Here's what BCFSA's Real Estate Services Rules actually say, the one narrow exception, and what it means if you're licensed in BC.

Not legal advice: This article summarizes publicly available regulatory information for general informational purposes. Always verify current requirements with the official regulator before relying on it.

From Disclosure to Prohibition

Real estate in Canada is regulated province by province, and British Columbia's rules on representing both sides of a deal are stricter than what many agents elsewhere in the country are used to. Under the Real Estate Services Rules (B.C. Reg. 209/2021), administered by the BC Financial Services Authority (BCFSA), dual agency is prohibited — not just disclosed and consented to, as under the older model many agents associate with real estate practice generally.

Rule 63 states it plainly: "A brokerage must not engage in dual agency." Dual agency means a licensee or brokerage representing two or more parties with competing interests in the same trade — most commonly, representing both the buyer and the seller, or two competing buyers, on the same property.

The One Narrow Exception

Rule 64 carves out a single, tightly defined exception: a brokerage may engage in dual agency if the property is in a remote location that is under-served by licensees — meaning there genuinely isn't reasonable access to another brokerage to represent the other party. Even then, using the exception requires proper disclosure and written agreement from both parties; it isn't a general escape hatch, and BCFSA guidance treats it as narrow by design.

What Changed and When

This isn't a brand-new 2026 announcement — the current version of the Real Estate Services Rules on dual agency was last amended July 1, 2024, under B.C. Reg. 101/2024. It's worth restating clearly now because agents relocating to BC from provinces with a disclosure-based dual agency model (where representing both sides with informed consent is permitted) sometimes assume the same approach applies here. It doesn't. If you're newly licensed in BC or moving your license there, treat this as a hard rule, not a best practice.

What This Means in Practice

  1. If a buyer client is interested in your own listing, refer them to a colleague or another brokerage rather than trying to represent both sides — the rule targets exactly this scenario.
  2. Don't rely on disclosure-and-consent as a workaround. Unlike jurisdictions where informed consent can authorize dual agency, BC's rule is a prohibition, not a disclosure requirement — consent doesn't cure it outside the under-served-location exception.
  3. If you genuinely believe the under-served exception applies, confirm the specific conditions with BCFSA or your managing broker before proceeding — get it in writing, and don't assume "hard to find another agent nearby" alone qualifies.
  4. Managing brokers should build this into new-agent onboarding, especially for licensees transferring in from other provinces.

Sources:

This article is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. Confirm current requirements directly with BCFSA or your managing broker before relying on any exception to the dual agency prohibition.

Get our weekly AI real estate newsletter

New tool reviews, law updates and deals — delivered to 8,000+ agents every week.